Objective of this paper finds out which is suitable material among
1) Partial cement replacements materials e.g. coal fly ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, silica fume, ground glass natural pozzolans or calcined clay
2)Recycled coarse aggregates and
3)Recycled fine aggregates for use under di?erent loading and environmental conditions in the construction / civil engineering industry.
Literature review ( the 1st page )
1. Properties & applications of sustainability of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively
2. Composition of sustainability of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively Experimental methodology (the 2nd page )
1. Full details of all mixes of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively 2. Details of experimental equipment for test of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials , recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively 3. Inclusion and elaboration of all relevant standards, i.e. BS, BS EN, etc. for captioned test Results (the 3rd page )
1. Appropriate graphs for each captioned concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate), ensuring that the main mechanical properties are illustrated. 2. Calculations must be elaborated and clearly explained for each captioned concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate).
Discussion (the 4th page)
1. Compare the values calculated from captioned test data with the control mixes and also expected values from standard texts or relevant web-based sources. It must be borne in mind the design strength mix is C32/40.
2. From abovementioned data / results, comment on the relative strength properties of the 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate).
3. Use of the theories are covered and more importantly compare with previously published work as appropriate.
Conclusion (the 5th page )
1. Among above-mentioned 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate), which concrete is sustainability for use under di?erent loading and environmental conditions in the construction / civil engineering industry. 2. A realistic case is adopted to support above claim
1) Partial cement replacements materials e.g. coal fly ash, ground granulated blastfurnace slag, silica fume, ground glass natural pozzolans or calcined clay
2)Recycled coarse aggregates and
3)Recycled fine aggregates for use under di?erent loading and environmental conditions in the construction / civil engineering industry.
Literature review ( the 1st page )
1. Properties & applications of sustainability of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively
2. Composition of sustainability of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively Experimental methodology (the 2nd page )
1. Full details of all mixes of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively 2. Details of experimental equipment for test of 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials , recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate) respectively 3. Inclusion and elaboration of all relevant standards, i.e. BS, BS EN, etc. for captioned test Results (the 3rd page )
1. Appropriate graphs for each captioned concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate), ensuring that the main mechanical properties are illustrated. 2. Calculations must be elaborated and clearly explained for each captioned concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate).
Discussion (the 4th page)
1. Compare the values calculated from captioned test data with the control mixes and also expected values from standard texts or relevant web-based sources. It must be borne in mind the design strength mix is C32/40.
2. From abovementioned data / results, comment on the relative strength properties of the 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate).
3. Use of the theories are covered and more importantly compare with previously published work as appropriate.
Conclusion (the 5th page )
1. Among above-mentioned 3 concrete (partial cement replacements materials, recycled ?ne aggregate, and recycled coarse aggregate), which concrete is sustainability for use under di?erent loading and environmental conditions in the construction / civil engineering industry. 2. A realistic case is adopted to support above claim
No comments:
Post a Comment