1. Identify one of your own child or adolescent cases. Summarize the presenting problem - I will use the case of Nadia (handouts attached)and relevant history.2. Provide a trauma-informed assessment of your client. The trauma assessment shouldinclude a brief description of the trauma HISTORY and a brief summary of emotionaland/or behavioral SYMPTOMS that have developed as a result of the trauma. Be sure tohighlight developmental and cultural factors that are salient to the assessment.Developmental concerns should speak to the child/adolescent’s achievement ofmilestones –individual, family, school, peers. Is the attachment relationship affected?Discuss how culture interacts with the experience of or impact of trauma. (Competency 1- Skill)3. Using the core concepts as a guide for prioritizing treatment issues, identify the mostimmediate treatment issues for your client. Use ONE, NO MORE THAN two coreconcepts.4. Discuss the efforts you have made to address ambivalence/resistance effectively withyour client and family. Identify the resistance/ambivalence clearly - it may be with thechild or it may be with the caregiver, - e.g. reluctant to attend sessions, avoids efforts atengagement which is affecting the relationship with the child - or both. (Competency 6 -Skill)5. Summarize the treatment to date. Indicate where, if at all, you have been able to useelements of the trauma treatment framework you have identified. (Competency 8 -Knowledge)6. Using the trauma treatment framework you have chosen as a guide, identify next steps inyour work with the client/client system
https://bit.ly/3I2Q6s0

- Submit a 3-page analysis (5 pages total with Title Page and References) of an article that cites an example of unethical behavior as related to corporate or an individual’s behavior in the use of technology/data or unethical manipulation of such. Your analysis should include a summary of the article, your analysis of the ethical problem presented in the article, and how the topic relates to a biblical world view. The ethical problem should be clearly stated. Do not assume that your summary makes the ethical problem self-evident.
- Article Selection: It is recommended that you choose a topic that is related to your major; however, the topic must incorporate technology. This should be a specific event, not an article such as “Five Ways Companies are Unethical with Data”. Such an article may be a good starting place but will not be sufficient for this assignment. The article will be current - from within the past 3 years. You can likely find an example from as recent as this week/month. As this may be a news article, be sure that you are using a valid source of news. You should find multiple sources reporting the same information to ensure that your assessment of the reporting is accurate. Feel free to cite from these additional sources as well as your main article.
- Biblical Worldview: You will include at least two biblical references in your analysis.
- Use APA format, including in-text citations and a reference page.Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.
https://bit.ly/3ntrkIc

Lily is a 20-year-old student at the local community college. When some of her friends and classmates told her about an outbreak of flu-like symptoms sweeping her campus during the past 2 weeks, Lily figured she shouldn't take her 3-day sore throat lightly. Your clinic has treated a few cases similar to Lily's. All the patients reported decreased appetite, headaches, and pain with swallowing. As Lily recounts these symptoms to you, you notice that she has a runny nose and a slight hoarseness in her voice but doesn't sound congested.

In this Case Study Assignment, you consider case studies of abnormal findings from patients in a clinical setting. You determine what history should be collected from the patients, what physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted, and formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.

To Prepare

By Day 1 of this week, you will be assigned to a specific case study for this Case Study Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your assignment from your Instructor.Also, your Case Study Assignment should be in the Episodic/Focused SOAP Note format rather than the traditional narrative style format. Refer to Chapter 2 of the Sullivan text and the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template in the Week 5 Learning Resources for guidance. Remember that all Episodic/Focused SOAP Notes have specific data included in every patient case.With regard to the case study you were assigned:Review this week's Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient.Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient's condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.The AssignmentUse the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template and create an episodic/focused note about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned using the episodic/focused note template provided in the Week 5 resources. Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for each case. List five different possible conditions for the patient's differential diagnosis and justify why you selected each.

Rubric:Using the Episodic/Focused SOAP Template:· Create documentation or an episodic/focused note in SOAP format about the patient in the case study to which you were assigned.

· Provide evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for your case.45 (45%) - 50 (50%)The response clearly, accurately, and thoroughly follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response thoroughly and accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.39 (39%) - 44 (44%)The response accurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response accurately provides detailed evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.33 (33%) - 38 (38%)The response follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and inaccuracy. The response provides evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness or inaccuracy in the evidence selected.0 (0%) - 32 (32%)The response incompletely and inaccurately follows the SOAP format to document the patient in the assigned case study. The response provides incomplete, inaccurate, and/or missing evidence from the literature to support diagnostic tests that would be appropriate for the patient in the assigned case study.· List five different possible conditions for the patient's differential diagnosis, and justify why you selected each.30 (30%) - 35 (35%)The response lists five distinctly different and detailed possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the five conditions selected.24 (24%) - 29 (29%)The response lists four or five different possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study and provides an accurate justification for each of the five conditions selected.18 (18%) - 23 (23%)The response lists three to five possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with some vagueness and/or inaccuracy in the conditions and/or justification for each.0 (0%) - 17 (17%)The response lists two or fewer, or is missing, possible conditions for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, with inaccurate or missing justification for each condition selected.Written Expression and Formatting - Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused--neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.3 (3%) - 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic.0 (0%) - 2 (2%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.Written Expression and Formatting - English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.3 (3%) - 3 (3%)Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.0 (0%) - 2 (2%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.Written Expression and Formatting - The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.5 (5%) - 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.4 (4%) - 4 (4%)Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.3 (3%) - 3 (3%)Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.0 (0%) - 2 (2%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
https://bit.ly/3y55XSv

Learning Goal: I'm working on a writing discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

- What would you describe as the primary strengths and potential development opportunities of Kaiser Permanente’s SLP program? What are the primary SLP goals and how effectively does the program achieve these goals?
- Which core leadership competencies is the SLP program designed to develop? What are the skills, knowledge areas, and/or behavioral competencies that are targeted for development via the SLP?
- How should Kaiser Permanente enhance its approach to evaluating the efficacy of the SLP? What are the metrics or outcomes that the organization should capture to assess the efficacy of the program?
- To what extent is a "role-based leadership development" program like the SLP aligned with your organization’s talent development needs? In what ways could greater emphasis on role-based development via strategically aligned projects develop leadership capabilities across your organization
https://bit.ly/3ubAwEH

Case: LYFT

Please read the case “Lyft” from Chapter 3 “Organizational Commitment” Page: - 81given in your textbook – Organizational behaviour: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (7th ed). by Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2021) and Answer the following Questions:

Assignment Question(s):

1. Consider the way that Lyft managers its drivers, compared to Uber. Should the things that Lyft does engender affective commitment, continuance commitment, or normative commitment? (03 Marks) (Min words 150-200)

2.Lyft’s drivers are technically independent contractors, rather than employees. Are there reasons to expect them to feel less commitment to the company because of that designation? Why? (03 Marks) (Min words 150-200)

3.Think about the job you seek to hold after graduation from your program. How would you answer the four STARA questions? If your organization began replacing employees with such technology, would that practice alter your commitment levels? (03 Marks) (Min words 200)

Part:-2

Discussion questions: - Please read Chapter 2 & 4 “Job Performance & Job Satisfaction” carefully and then give your answers on the basis of your understanding.

4.Describe a job in which citizenship behaviours would be especially critical to an organization’s functioning, and one in which citizenship behaviours would be less critical. What is it about a job that makes citizenship more important? (02 Marks ) (Min words 200-300)

5. Consider how you would react to 360-degree feedback. If you were the one receiving the feedback, whose views would you value most: your manager’s or your peer’s? (02 Marks ) (Min words 150-200)

6. What steps can organizations take to improve promotion satisfaction, supervision satisfaction, and co-worker satisfaction? (02 Marks ) (Min words 150-200)

Important Note: -

1. Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.

2. References required in the assignment. Use APA style for writing references.
https://bit.ly/3bAf5aa

This is an 750-1000 word paper in which you will:

(1) present one behavior change and describe how it would improve your short- and long-term health.

(2) write about the reasons why you might want to engage in that behavior change and how you can overcome those barriers.

(3) design a plan for adopting the behavior change that you can make and follow that plan for at least 10 days.

Make sure your plan describes only ONE behavior change, and that the change is specific and measurable.

For this paper, use the following guidelines:

- Formatting: All assignments should be double spaced, with 1” margins all around, Times New Roman 12 point font, and no extra spaces between paragraphs.
https://bit.ly/3yqE08U

You are required to conduct some research into how HR supports organisational performance.1.Provide a brief business justification for managing HR in a professional, ethical and just manner (AC1.3) (approx 100 words)Explain how these have evolved/are evolving in contemporary organisations. (AC1.2) (approx 200 words)Give examples of the main organisational objectives that the HR function is responsible for delivering. (AC1.1) (approx 200 words)2.Give a brief summary of two different ways HR objectives can be delivered in organisations. (AC1.1) (approx 250 words)Analyse how the HR function varies between organisations in different sectors and of different sizes. (AC2.2) You should examine three of the following types of organisation. 1. A public authority (Government Sector) 2. A national private company 3. An SME 4. A voluntary (Third Sector) organisation (approx 250 words)3.Discuss the main criteria and methods used to evaluate the contribution of the HR function (AC3.1) Your response should consider (briefly) the following: 1. HR metrics used to evaluate HR function contribution 2. SLA’s and KPI’s 3. Staff surveys 4. Benchmarking with other organisations 5. Return on Investment (ROI) 6. How a ‘balanced scorecard and/or ‘HR dashboard’ might be used to present HR metrics (approx 500 words)4.With reference to the article you have accessed from Online Services, what are the key messages from the report? (AC4.1) (approx 150 words) (Attached)How convincing do you think these findings are and why? (AC4.1) (approx 150 words)From your understanding of the findings in the report, how can high performance working and investment in people impact on organisational performance? (AC4.2) (approx 200 words)5- ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Please also comment on how you will transfer the new knowledge and skills gained during this assignment into working practices. You may also use this reflection for your CPD. (approx 200 words)You should also include at least one reference in each section of the report from up to date and relevant sources in order to support your findings

Comments from Customer

Customer is an international student. Please, provide a regular grammatically correct, well-structured paper according to the instructions and academic context provided, written with simple sentence structures and easy vocabulary (or shortly, use simple English).
https://bit.ly/3uxjaCH