Identify and develop your thesis statement and your resolution of your chosen issue. Remember that this is just your initial version of the thesis statement for the Capstone Paper; expect that it will evolve after receiving feedback from your instructor and classmates and as you conduct more research on solutions for your chosen issue.
Your initial post should be 300 words. Support your work with at least one scholarly resource.
NOTE: The chosen social issue is "Overcrowding in Correctional Institutions"
https://bit.ly/3tmTh7J
Tuesday, 7 June 2022
Develop a phased implementation plan that goes with the recommendations on the powerpoint
Create a balanced scorecard to measure the success of your strategy with graphs, percentages etc.
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a thorough analysis of a company that becomes the basis for a strategic recommendation. You will formally present the results of your analysis to class members (who will play the role of the Board of Directors) and elicit their approval for your recommendations. They will ask relevant questions and challenge some of the ideas presented, just as any board would do.
PURPOSE: Understand the complex issues facing executives and business owners, the diversity of factors they need to consider, and the difficulty in knowing whether they have made the right decision or are implementing it correctly.
NOTES
1. Do not focus on the questions at the end of the case. Based on your strategic analysis, determine the critical success factors, alternatives, and your recommendations, including an implementation plan and measurement criteria.
1. Although you should use the material at the time of the case as discussed in the text, you must address all elements of the rubric. If your case has limited financial information, you will need to gather data from external sources in order to perform the required financial analysis, including a trend analysis comparing the company to the industry and/or key competitors.
https://bit.ly/3xsnRzl
Create a balanced scorecard to measure the success of your strategy with graphs, percentages etc.
OBJECTIVE: Conduct a thorough analysis of a company that becomes the basis for a strategic recommendation. You will formally present the results of your analysis to class members (who will play the role of the Board of Directors) and elicit their approval for your recommendations. They will ask relevant questions and challenge some of the ideas presented, just as any board would do.
PURPOSE: Understand the complex issues facing executives and business owners, the diversity of factors they need to consider, and the difficulty in knowing whether they have made the right decision or are implementing it correctly.
NOTES
1. Do not focus on the questions at the end of the case. Based on your strategic analysis, determine the critical success factors, alternatives, and your recommendations, including an implementation plan and measurement criteria.
1. Although you should use the material at the time of the case as discussed in the text, you must address all elements of the rubric. If your case has limited financial information, you will need to gather data from external sources in order to perform the required financial analysis, including a trend analysis comparing the company to the industry and/or key competitors.
https://bit.ly/3xsnRzl
Analyze the influence of patient factors on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes
Analyze the impact of changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes on patient drug therapies
Evaluate drug therapy plans for cardiovascular disorders
LM is an 89-year-old female resident of a long-term care facility who has been experiencing multiple falls, some resulting in injuries such as bruising and skin tears. Over the last 6 months, her ambulation status has declined from independent to wheelchair level. She complains of pain in her legs when walking more than short distances across the nursing unit.
PMH:
HTN
Alzheimer’s disease
Hypothyroidism
Osteoarthritis
Diabetes
MEDICATIONS:
Amlodipine 10 mg QD
Donepezil 10 mg QHS
Levothyroxine 0.88 mg QAM
Celecoxib 200 mg QD
Furosemide 40 mg QAM
Metformin 500mg, 1 BID
Glyburide 5mg, 1 BID
ALLERGIES: NKA
SOCIAL HISTORY:
Widowed with 2 adult children living in town, retired photographer and owner of an art supply store
VITALS: LABS:
Weight: 129 lbs TSH 2.45 Free T4 0.98
Height: 64 inches Na 135, K+ 3.8, Cl 99, CO2 25,
BP: Supine = 177/82 Glucose 101, SCr 0.9, BUN 42
HR: 78 bpm WBC 7.0, RBC 4.5, Hgb 11.9, Hct 34.1
Plt 255
Cr: 1.6 UA: Clear
eGFR: 45 ml/min
PE:
HEENT: Normocephalic, no evidence of trauma, PERRLA, EOMI, Dry mucous membranes
CV: RRR
Respiratory: Clear to auscultation bilaterally
Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no masses or guarding
G/U: Skin intact, assisted with toileting and personal hygiene by staff
Extremities: Bilateral 2+ edema to lower extremities; skin dry, dark bruising and skin tear to right elbow and forearm
Neuro: Alert and oriented to person only. MMSE 18/30, stable over last 12 months.
PAIN ASSESSMENT:
Faces pain scale: No pain occurs at rest, upon walking, pain is moderate to severe
Requirements: 3-4 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. My professor will be submitting the paper to Turnitin
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph
Please be sure to use sources that are credible or scholarly
Requirements: 3-4 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
https://bit.ly/3970PVz
Analyze the impact of changes in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes on patient drug therapies
Evaluate drug therapy plans for cardiovascular disorders
LM is an 89-year-old female resident of a long-term care facility who has been experiencing multiple falls, some resulting in injuries such as bruising and skin tears. Over the last 6 months, her ambulation status has declined from independent to wheelchair level. She complains of pain in her legs when walking more than short distances across the nursing unit.
PMH:
HTN
Alzheimer’s disease
Hypothyroidism
Osteoarthritis
Diabetes
MEDICATIONS:
Amlodipine 10 mg QD
Donepezil 10 mg QHS
Levothyroxine 0.88 mg QAM
Celecoxib 200 mg QD
Furosemide 40 mg QAM
Metformin 500mg, 1 BID
Glyburide 5mg, 1 BID
ALLERGIES: NKA
SOCIAL HISTORY:
Widowed with 2 adult children living in town, retired photographer and owner of an art supply store
VITALS: LABS:
Weight: 129 lbs TSH 2.45 Free T4 0.98
Height: 64 inches Na 135, K+ 3.8, Cl 99, CO2 25,
BP: Supine = 177/82 Glucose 101, SCr 0.9, BUN 42
HR: 78 bpm WBC 7.0, RBC 4.5, Hgb 11.9, Hct 34.1
Plt 255
Cr: 1.6 UA: Clear
eGFR: 45 ml/min
PE:
HEENT: Normocephalic, no evidence of trauma, PERRLA, EOMI, Dry mucous membranes
CV: RRR
Respiratory: Clear to auscultation bilaterally
Abdomen: Soft, non-tender, no masses or guarding
G/U: Skin intact, assisted with toileting and personal hygiene by staff
Extremities: Bilateral 2+ edema to lower extremities; skin dry, dark bruising and skin tear to right elbow and forearm
Neuro: Alert and oriented to person only. MMSE 18/30, stable over last 12 months.
PAIN ASSESSMENT:
Faces pain scale: No pain occurs at rest, upon walking, pain is moderate to severe
Requirements: 3-4 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
Please be sure to include an introduction with a clear thesis statement along with a conclusion
Please be sure to carefully follow the instructions
No plagiarism & No Course Hero & No Chegg. My professor will be submitting the paper to Turnitin
Please be sure to include at least one in-text citation in each body paragraph
Please be sure to use sources that are credible or scholarly
Requirements: 3-4 Full Pages Times New Roman Size 12 Font Double-Spaced APA Format Excluding the Title and Reference Pages
https://bit.ly/3970PVz
Assessment 2: Documenting your Social Work Statement and Professional Development Plan
Word limit/weighting: 1700 words/ 45% ) I need a good mark on this assignment so I can guarantee pass)
Task: Suppose that you are applying for a position as a graduate social worker/community worker.
Aim of this task: Synthesise learning and prepare for practice, either in field education or employment
Background steps
- Go to Seek.Com or LinkedIn and select a position that you are applying for (Suggestion: make it in the area in which you have done a placement so that you can rely on your field knowledge).
- Access the following documents:
- Position Description/Job and Person Specifications, which should have a brief statement about the organisational context, and the sort of work expected in the role.
- The Selection Criteria which will tell you what the selection will be based on.
- These will give you an idea of the context and role. Insert these at the head of your paper (they are outside the word limit).
- After an initial telephone interview, you have been asked to submit a piece of written work for the next stage of the selection process. (These are the creative bits of the task).
Assessment tasks
The request is this:
Please supply a statement of your understanding of social work in this role. It should include answers to these questions and rely on your own words built on the academic literature, properly referenced. Task: Suppose that you are applying for a position as a graduate social worker/community worker.
QuestionTipsWhat is the mission of social work?Note that you need to write in your own words, using referencesWhat is your mission as a social worker?Be mindful of the application/organisation but this is an opportunity for you to think about yourself as a social worker…own it!What does professional integrity mean to you?You may or may not declare your own philosophical position eg derived from you faith/spirituality/politics in a job search process …it may be applicable depending on the organisation…your call here but you can definitely makes statements that are consistent with wider social work thinking and valuesHow will you deal with ethical complexity in this role?Remember to draw on AASW Code of Ethics (2020), check whether the organisation has a public Code of Practice; refer to the relevant legislation in this field; also draw on the resources from this and all your topicsWhat are your plans for professional growth and development, especially in relation to social work judgment and decision-making and ethical practice?Refer to what you have learned in this topic across your degree– what did you learn about yourself and what you need to develop further?Use the Professional Development Plan Template from the AASW (link below)How will you sustain yourself in this role? Resources on their way!They will be released through Collaborate 22/05/22
Link to learning opportunities: This assessment links to Module #2: Reason and Resources in which we examine resources and start building a synthesis across the MSW.
The task aims to assist you to:
Start building a philosophical and conceptual framework as part of your journey towards mature practice and integrity with a focus on yourself as an ethical, knowledgeable and skillful decision-maker in social work
- Reflect on and generalise from your life and learning experiences
- Prepare for employment as a graduate social worker
Additional tips to assist with completing this task: (analysis and synthesis)
Apply concept or mind mapping
- What is the core question I am asking here?
- How do I now link it to other questions?
- I think this is a question about social work effectiveness, so
- E.g. What do I need to be and to have in order to be an effective social worker?
Build dynamic links, not simply linear arguments… use hierarchies e.g. from general to specific
http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.htm
Revisit your resources
Ask: Now that I have taken my thinking deeper – from reporting to analysing and organising is there anything else I need here to build relevance, accuracy, precision, clarity, depth, and breadth into my argument?
Arrive at a tentative conclusion
Writing up is also a thinking process based on ongoing judgment, seeing a point of view in a new light, evaluating our argument… an early/evolving draft helps you discipline and direct your thinking. Distil this into a simple proposition…maybe 3 sentences. This forms the top of your argument pyramid. This is a way of moving from a plan to research and investigate to presenting a convincing statement. It is the point at which you switch to persuasion. Note that we are developing a document to present to a prospective employer, not a conventional academic essay.
One model is Barbra Minto’s The Pyramid Principle (2009)
The main components of pyramid theory:
- Start with ‘the answer’
- Ideas at any level must always be summaries of the ideas grouped below them
- Ideas in each group must always be the same kind of information
- Ideas in each group must be logically ordered
Work on 2nd and final drafts, including revisiting the answer statements
Pay attention to the flow of the argument, to logic and the connections between thoughts.
Have I over relied on ‘the authorities’? Have I inserted my own personal, unsubstantiated opinions here? Does my conclusion hold up now? Do I need to revise, refine, make more explicit, clear and direct? (this should ideally be a succinct statement about how you describe yourself as a social worker)
Ensure rigorous academic integrity When in doubt cite it!
Academic integrity governs the way in which you research and write while at University. It is founded on the principles of respect for knowledge, truth, scholarship and acting with honesty. These principles and values are the foundation of academia. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/service/library/tutorials/infoskills/glossary.html
To get more depth and understanding about the application of the principles of academic integrity and to see where you might unintentionally breach accepted practice, use FLO –
Professional Development Plan: Self-Assess, noting and building on feedback
This is an ongoing activity that is about being able to view your own work critically, looking for clarity, precision, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth, and logicalness. It is also about being able to build on the feedback/ feedforward you receive.
This forms the basis for your Professional Development Plan which must address these questions, answered within a table, based on the template proposed by the AASW: See
https://www.aasw.asn.au/professional-development/creating-a-cpd-plan
(Note that it asks for your membership number, insert if you are a member, otherwise leave blank.) You may add other cells if you wish. Make it relevant to the position for which yu are applying.
CONCLUSION: CRITICAL, REFLECTIVE, REFLEXIVE, ETHICAL THINKING SOCIAL WORKERS
Remember critical thinking is not about whinging and complaining or trotting out your favourite biases and opinions about the government, people, the world and everything! And then finding a few references to back you up. It is primarily about learning about yourself – personally and professionally. It is about gaining insight, knowledge, and skills that will contribute to you becoming a confident, compassionate professional social worker, making sound judgements and defensible decisions in collaboration with your colleagues and clients within the context of a human service underpinned by law and driven by policies.
MODULE#2: REASON & RESOURCES
Teaching Week 729/04/22What resources are available to guide our thinking in messy situations? Reread AASW Code of Ethics 2020Teaching Week 806/05/22How do we develop phronesis? What is the place of being reasonable and values explicit?Read/watch: The Ethics CentreEthics Explainer: Consciencehttps://ethics.org.au/ethics-explainer-conscience/Teaching Week 913/05/22Which practice approaches will ensure that our professional judgement is knowledge based, theoretically sound, and ethically rigorous?Watch: Uni. Of Buffalo Social WorkEthical Dilemmas in Contemporary Social Work: trends and Challengeshttps://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=24Teaching Week 1020/05/22What skills will ensure that our professional judgement is knowledge based, theoretically sound, and ethically rigorous?Read: International Federation of Social WorkersEthical Decision-making in the face of COVID-19https://www.ifsw.org/ethical-decision-making-in-the-face-of-covid-19/Teaching Week 11 27/05/22How do we connect our learning to practice? How do we sustain ourselves?The Imposter Syndrome within then Social Work Profession: Watch: Uni of Buffalo Social Work: Recognizing your true potential https://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=237Your assessment task #2 is almost dueFrom 4-5 25/03/22 we will discuss assessment (recorded on Collaborate)Teaching Week 12 03/06/22How do we develop moral courage? How does this relate professional and personal growth?Read/watch: The Ethics CentreCourage isn’t about facing our fears; it’s about facing ourselveshttps://ethics.org.au/courage-isnt-about-facing-our-fears-its-about-facing-ourselves/ Teaching Week 13 10/06/22How do we see the golden thread through all this?This session will be pre-corded and uploaded on or before 27 May 2022 to assist with your assessment task. An announcement will be made when it is available. Your assessment task is due
Assessment 2: Documenting your Social Work Statement and Professional Development Plan
Due: 08 June 2022
Word limit/weighting: 1700 words/ 45%
A note about this rubric: It does not address professional skills/capabilities (e.g. such as you might find n SW skills topic; or in engineering) …it provides guidance about what we look for as evidence of following instructions and displaying high level critical thinking. It does not tell you how to do the task, those instructions are in Slow Thinking, the Assessment Hub and canvassed by students in the Discussion Forum. You can most effectively use it by applying it to your own work, preferably between the first and final drafts so that you can identify ares that require strengthening in your work.
Marking criteria Guidance for assessmentHigh Distinction85%+Distinction75%-84%Credit65%-74%Pass50%-64%Fail
A note about this rubric: It does not address professional skills/capabilities (e.g. such as you might find n SW skills topic; or in engineering) …it provides guidance about what we look for as evidence of following instructions and displaying high level critical thinking. It does not tell you how to do the task, those instructions are in Slow Thinking, the Assessment Hub and canvassed by students in the Discussion Forum. You can most effectively use it by applying it to your own work, preferably between the first and final drafts so that you can identify ares that require strengthening in your work.
Marking criteria Guidance for assessmentHigh Distinction85%+Distinction75%-84%Credit65%-74%Pass50%-64%Fail
https://bit.ly/3NH7vs8
Word limit/weighting: 1700 words/ 45% ) I need a good mark on this assignment so I can guarantee pass)
Task: Suppose that you are applying for a position as a graduate social worker/community worker.
Aim of this task: Synthesise learning and prepare for practice, either in field education or employment
Background steps
- Go to Seek.Com or LinkedIn and select a position that you are applying for (Suggestion: make it in the area in which you have done a placement so that you can rely on your field knowledge).
- Access the following documents:
- Position Description/Job and Person Specifications, which should have a brief statement about the organisational context, and the sort of work expected in the role.
- The Selection Criteria which will tell you what the selection will be based on.
- These will give you an idea of the context and role. Insert these at the head of your paper (they are outside the word limit).
- After an initial telephone interview, you have been asked to submit a piece of written work for the next stage of the selection process. (These are the creative bits of the task).
Assessment tasks
The request is this:
Please supply a statement of your understanding of social work in this role. It should include answers to these questions and rely on your own words built on the academic literature, properly referenced. Task: Suppose that you are applying for a position as a graduate social worker/community worker.
QuestionTipsWhat is the mission of social work?Note that you need to write in your own words, using referencesWhat is your mission as a social worker?Be mindful of the application/organisation but this is an opportunity for you to think about yourself as a social worker…own it!What does professional integrity mean to you?You may or may not declare your own philosophical position eg derived from you faith/spirituality/politics in a job search process …it may be applicable depending on the organisation…your call here but you can definitely makes statements that are consistent with wider social work thinking and valuesHow will you deal with ethical complexity in this role?Remember to draw on AASW Code of Ethics (2020), check whether the organisation has a public Code of Practice; refer to the relevant legislation in this field; also draw on the resources from this and all your topicsWhat are your plans for professional growth and development, especially in relation to social work judgment and decision-making and ethical practice?Refer to what you have learned in this topic across your degree– what did you learn about yourself and what you need to develop further?Use the Professional Development Plan Template from the AASW (link below)How will you sustain yourself in this role? Resources on their way!They will be released through Collaborate 22/05/22
Link to learning opportunities: This assessment links to Module #2: Reason and Resources in which we examine resources and start building a synthesis across the MSW.
The task aims to assist you to:
Start building a philosophical and conceptual framework as part of your journey towards mature practice and integrity with a focus on yourself as an ethical, knowledgeable and skillful decision-maker in social work
- Reflect on and generalise from your life and learning experiences
- Prepare for employment as a graduate social worker
Additional tips to assist with completing this task: (analysis and synthesis)
Apply concept or mind mapping
- What is the core question I am asking here?
- How do I now link it to other questions?
- I think this is a question about social work effectiveness, so
- E.g. What do I need to be and to have in order to be an effective social worker?
Build dynamic links, not simply linear arguments… use hierarchies e.g. from general to specific
http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryCmaps/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.htm
Revisit your resources
Ask: Now that I have taken my thinking deeper – from reporting to analysing and organising is there anything else I need here to build relevance, accuracy, precision, clarity, depth, and breadth into my argument?
Arrive at a tentative conclusion
Writing up is also a thinking process based on ongoing judgment, seeing a point of view in a new light, evaluating our argument… an early/evolving draft helps you discipline and direct your thinking. Distil this into a simple proposition…maybe 3 sentences. This forms the top of your argument pyramid. This is a way of moving from a plan to research and investigate to presenting a convincing statement. It is the point at which you switch to persuasion. Note that we are developing a document to present to a prospective employer, not a conventional academic essay.
One model is Barbra Minto’s The Pyramid Principle (2009)
The main components of pyramid theory:
- Start with ‘the answer’
- Ideas at any level must always be summaries of the ideas grouped below them
- Ideas in each group must always be the same kind of information
- Ideas in each group must be logically ordered
Work on 2nd and final drafts, including revisiting the answer statements
Pay attention to the flow of the argument, to logic and the connections between thoughts.
Have I over relied on ‘the authorities’? Have I inserted my own personal, unsubstantiated opinions here? Does my conclusion hold up now? Do I need to revise, refine, make more explicit, clear and direct? (this should ideally be a succinct statement about how you describe yourself as a social worker)
Ensure rigorous academic integrity When in doubt cite it!
Academic integrity governs the way in which you research and write while at University. It is founded on the principles of respect for knowledge, truth, scholarship and acting with honesty. These principles and values are the foundation of academia. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/service/library/tutorials/infoskills/glossary.html
To get more depth and understanding about the application of the principles of academic integrity and to see where you might unintentionally breach accepted practice, use FLO –
Professional Development Plan: Self-Assess, noting and building on feedback
This is an ongoing activity that is about being able to view your own work critically, looking for clarity, precision, accuracy, relevance, depth, breadth, and logicalness. It is also about being able to build on the feedback/ feedforward you receive.
This forms the basis for your Professional Development Plan which must address these questions, answered within a table, based on the template proposed by the AASW: See
https://www.aasw.asn.au/professional-development/creating-a-cpd-plan
(Note that it asks for your membership number, insert if you are a member, otherwise leave blank.) You may add other cells if you wish. Make it relevant to the position for which yu are applying.
CONCLUSION: CRITICAL, REFLECTIVE, REFLEXIVE, ETHICAL THINKING SOCIAL WORKERS
Remember critical thinking is not about whinging and complaining or trotting out your favourite biases and opinions about the government, people, the world and everything! And then finding a few references to back you up. It is primarily about learning about yourself – personally and professionally. It is about gaining insight, knowledge, and skills that will contribute to you becoming a confident, compassionate professional social worker, making sound judgements and defensible decisions in collaboration with your colleagues and clients within the context of a human service underpinned by law and driven by policies.
MODULE#2: REASON & RESOURCES
Teaching Week 729/04/22What resources are available to guide our thinking in messy situations? Reread AASW Code of Ethics 2020Teaching Week 806/05/22How do we develop phronesis? What is the place of being reasonable and values explicit?Read/watch: The Ethics CentreEthics Explainer: Consciencehttps://ethics.org.au/ethics-explainer-conscience/Teaching Week 913/05/22Which practice approaches will ensure that our professional judgement is knowledge based, theoretically sound, and ethically rigorous?Watch: Uni. Of Buffalo Social WorkEthical Dilemmas in Contemporary Social Work: trends and Challengeshttps://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=24Teaching Week 1020/05/22What skills will ensure that our professional judgement is knowledge based, theoretically sound, and ethically rigorous?Read: International Federation of Social WorkersEthical Decision-making in the face of COVID-19https://www.ifsw.org/ethical-decision-making-in-the-face-of-covid-19/Teaching Week 11 27/05/22How do we connect our learning to practice? How do we sustain ourselves?The Imposter Syndrome within then Social Work Profession: Watch: Uni of Buffalo Social Work: Recognizing your true potential https://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=237Your assessment task #2 is almost dueFrom 4-5 25/03/22 we will discuss assessment (recorded on Collaborate)Teaching Week 12 03/06/22How do we develop moral courage? How does this relate professional and personal growth?Read/watch: The Ethics CentreCourage isn’t about facing our fears; it’s about facing ourselveshttps://ethics.org.au/courage-isnt-about-facing-our-fears-its-about-facing-ourselves/ Teaching Week 13 10/06/22How do we see the golden thread through all this?This session will be pre-corded and uploaded on or before 27 May 2022 to assist with your assessment task. An announcement will be made when it is available. Your assessment task is due
Assessment 2: Documenting your Social Work Statement and Professional Development Plan
Due: 08 June 2022
Word limit/weighting: 1700 words/ 45%
A note about this rubric: It does not address professional skills/capabilities (e.g. such as you might find n SW skills topic; or in engineering) …it provides guidance about what we look for as evidence of following instructions and displaying high level critical thinking. It does not tell you how to do the task, those instructions are in Slow Thinking, the Assessment Hub and canvassed by students in the Discussion Forum. You can most effectively use it by applying it to your own work, preferably between the first and final drafts so that you can identify ares that require strengthening in your work.
Marking criteria Guidance for assessmentHigh Distinction85%+Distinction75%-84%Credit65%-74%Pass50%-64%Fail
A note about this rubric: It does not address professional skills/capabilities (e.g. such as you might find n SW skills topic; or in engineering) …it provides guidance about what we look for as evidence of following instructions and displaying high level critical thinking. It does not tell you how to do the task, those instructions are in Slow Thinking, the Assessment Hub and canvassed by students in the Discussion Forum. You can most effectively use it by applying it to your own work, preferably between the first and final drafts so that you can identify ares that require strengthening in your work.
Marking criteria Guidance for assessmentHigh Distinction85%+Distinction75%-84%Credit65%-74%Pass50%-64%Fail
https://bit.ly/3NH7vs8
Epidemics have played an important role in shaping world history. This week, please watch the following video on the Influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 and respond to the specific prompt.Here are the specific directions for the Module this week:1). Access the web site for the video.
Science Matters | Episode 102 | 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic
2). Please post your response to following prompt on the Discussion Board for this week.
- The Influenza virus results in a common viral disease known as 'the flu'. Although this disease is typically present in the fall-winter months, it usually does not result in an infectious disease with the magnitude it had during the fall-winter of 1918-1919. Discuss at least 3 specific factors that you feel contributed to the severity of the epidemic suffered in 1918-1919. Please support your facts with at least 2 scientific references.
3). Respond to at least 2 of your peers' posts by Sunday night at midnight.
https://bit.ly/3Noc5LX
Science Matters | Episode 102 | 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic
2). Please post your response to following prompt on the Discussion Board for this week.
- The Influenza virus results in a common viral disease known as 'the flu'. Although this disease is typically present in the fall-winter months, it usually does not result in an infectious disease with the magnitude it had during the fall-winter of 1918-1919. Discuss at least 3 specific factors that you feel contributed to the severity of the epidemic suffered in 1918-1919. Please support your facts with at least 2 scientific references.
3). Respond to at least 2 of your peers' posts by Sunday night at midnight.
https://bit.ly/3Noc5LX
Please review and answer each question with 5-6 sentence.
Objective: to promote critical thinking skills by exploring and critiquing some well-known psychological research studies regarding possible ethical violations
Directions: Read each of the following summaries of famous studies in psychology. After each one, examine the research for ethical violations. Discuss whether or not each study could be conducted today in light of modern ethical guidelines governing research, and why or why not. How each study could be redesigned to eliminate or minimize the ethical problems.
Example 1: Little Albert. Watson and Rayner (1920) taught a young boy named Albert to become afraid of a gentle white rat. At the beginning of the study, Albert was unafraid of the white rat and played freely with the animal. While he was playing with the rat, the experimenters frightened the child by making a loud noise behind him. Albert was startled and began to cry. Thereafter, he avoided the rat and would cry whenever it was brought close to him. Once this fear was learned, Watson and Rayner found that fear could also be elicited by showing Albert any furry object. He became frightened of many other furry objects such as a fur coat, a dog, a rabbit, and a furry face mask.
Example 2: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Six hundred low-income African American males, 400 of whom were infected with syphilis, were monitored for 40 years. The purpose of the study was to examine the long-term effects of syphilis. The subjects of the study were the 400 African American males with syphilis, who were primarily poor sharecroppers. They were unaware that they had syphilis. They were also unaware of the true nature of the experiment. The most horrifying aspect of the experiment was that, even in the 1950s, when penicillin was proved to be effective at curing syphilis, the researchers did not treat the men’s syphilis. They even prevented other doctors who saw the participants from treating the syphilis. As many as 100 men may have died from complications of their untreated syphilis.
Example 3: NIH-Funded Studies. In the period of time between 1945 and 1966, the U.S. National Institutes of Health funded 2,000 research projects, and none of them used informed consent. An article written by Henry Beecher that appeared in the June 16, 1966, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine exposed many clinical research trials that had been funded by the government that were highly unethical. One of the examples concerned mentally retarded children at a state school who were infected with hepatitis virus. The researcher who carried out this experiment eventually became head of the pediatrics department at New York University. He felt that the experiment was justified, because finding a cure for hepatitis would help many more people. In each of Beecher’s examples, clinical trials were done on what some may consider “marginal” members of society, such as the poor, developmentally disabled, and senile. These “marginalized” members of society were unable to decide for themselves whether or not to participate in these trials.
For further information on unethical research practices, as well as examples that can be discussed in class, visit the following Internet sites:The History and Importance of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials /> Using Human Subjects for Medical Research
https://bit.ly/3tkPFmC
Objective: to promote critical thinking skills by exploring and critiquing some well-known psychological research studies regarding possible ethical violations
Directions: Read each of the following summaries of famous studies in psychology. After each one, examine the research for ethical violations. Discuss whether or not each study could be conducted today in light of modern ethical guidelines governing research, and why or why not. How each study could be redesigned to eliminate or minimize the ethical problems.
Example 1: Little Albert. Watson and Rayner (1920) taught a young boy named Albert to become afraid of a gentle white rat. At the beginning of the study, Albert was unafraid of the white rat and played freely with the animal. While he was playing with the rat, the experimenters frightened the child by making a loud noise behind him. Albert was startled and began to cry. Thereafter, he avoided the rat and would cry whenever it was brought close to him. Once this fear was learned, Watson and Rayner found that fear could also be elicited by showing Albert any furry object. He became frightened of many other furry objects such as a fur coat, a dog, a rabbit, and a furry face mask.
Example 2: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Six hundred low-income African American males, 400 of whom were infected with syphilis, were monitored for 40 years. The purpose of the study was to examine the long-term effects of syphilis. The subjects of the study were the 400 African American males with syphilis, who were primarily poor sharecroppers. They were unaware that they had syphilis. They were also unaware of the true nature of the experiment. The most horrifying aspect of the experiment was that, even in the 1950s, when penicillin was proved to be effective at curing syphilis, the researchers did not treat the men’s syphilis. They even prevented other doctors who saw the participants from treating the syphilis. As many as 100 men may have died from complications of their untreated syphilis.
Example 3: NIH-Funded Studies. In the period of time between 1945 and 1966, the U.S. National Institutes of Health funded 2,000 research projects, and none of them used informed consent. An article written by Henry Beecher that appeared in the June 16, 1966, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine exposed many clinical research trials that had been funded by the government that were highly unethical. One of the examples concerned mentally retarded children at a state school who were infected with hepatitis virus. The researcher who carried out this experiment eventually became head of the pediatrics department at New York University. He felt that the experiment was justified, because finding a cure for hepatitis would help many more people. In each of Beecher’s examples, clinical trials were done on what some may consider “marginal” members of society, such as the poor, developmentally disabled, and senile. These “marginalized” members of society were unable to decide for themselves whether or not to participate in these trials.
For further information on unethical research practices, as well as examples that can be discussed in class, visit the following Internet sites:The History and Importance of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials /> Using Human Subjects for Medical Research
https://bit.ly/3tkPFmC
Hi, there are total 6 question. I need help for them. I am requesting to the tutor who is expert in this field can accept the bid other wise don't need to accept. Less than 10% plagiarism or similarity is accept because it is a University assignment. I need Harvard style References.
1. Explain Johari Window model.( words 400-500)
2. Elucidate Maslow’s need hierarchy theory of motivation. ( words 400-500)
3. Define emotion, describe its characteristics. How does it differ from affect and moods? Explain by giving examples. ( words 400-500)
4. Define Motivation. Why is motivation important for an organization? Discuss intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.( words 400-500)
5. How the organizations manage cultural diversity? Discuss some methods to be carried out by managers to manage cultural diversity efficiently.( words 400-500)
6. Why do people resist change? Discuss the strategies which can be adapted to overcome resistance to change. ( words 400-500)
https://bit.ly/3mrARic
1. Explain Johari Window model.( words 400-500)
2. Elucidate Maslow’s need hierarchy theory of motivation. ( words 400-500)
3. Define emotion, describe its characteristics. How does it differ from affect and moods? Explain by giving examples. ( words 400-500)
4. Define Motivation. Why is motivation important for an organization? Discuss intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.( words 400-500)
5. How the organizations manage cultural diversity? Discuss some methods to be carried out by managers to manage cultural diversity efficiently.( words 400-500)
6. Why do people resist change? Discuss the strategies which can be adapted to overcome resistance to change. ( words 400-500)
https://bit.ly/3mrARic
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
With this assignment, you will learn about and discuss various neurological alterations. For this paper, you will need to describe and discu...
-
Due Week 8 and worth 190 points Recall from Assignment 1 the company had a few HR-related lawsuits that were not in the company's favo...
-
Using the Global Competitive Index Report (“GCI”) accessible by this link: WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019-1.pdf Please do the...