Epidemics have played an important role in shaping world history. This week, please watch the following video on the Influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 and respond to the specific prompt.Here are the specific directions for the Module this week:1). Access the web site for the video.
Science Matters | Episode 102 | 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic
2). Please post your response to following prompt on the Discussion Board for this week.
- The Influenza virus results in a common viral disease known as 'the flu'. Although this disease is typically present in the fall-winter months, it usually does not result in an infectious disease with the magnitude it had during the fall-winter of 1918-1919. Discuss at least 3 specific factors that you feel contributed to the severity of the epidemic suffered in 1918-1919. Please support your facts with at least 2 scientific references.
3). Respond to at least 2 of your peers' posts by Sunday night at midnight.
https://bit.ly/3Noc5LX
Tuesday, 7 June 2022
Please review and answer each question with 5-6 sentence.
Objective: to promote critical thinking skills by exploring and critiquing some well-known psychological research studies regarding possible ethical violations
Directions: Read each of the following summaries of famous studies in psychology. After each one, examine the research for ethical violations. Discuss whether or not each study could be conducted today in light of modern ethical guidelines governing research, and why or why not. How each study could be redesigned to eliminate or minimize the ethical problems.
Example 1: Little Albert. Watson and Rayner (1920) taught a young boy named Albert to become afraid of a gentle white rat. At the beginning of the study, Albert was unafraid of the white rat and played freely with the animal. While he was playing with the rat, the experimenters frightened the child by making a loud noise behind him. Albert was startled and began to cry. Thereafter, he avoided the rat and would cry whenever it was brought close to him. Once this fear was learned, Watson and Rayner found that fear could also be elicited by showing Albert any furry object. He became frightened of many other furry objects such as a fur coat, a dog, a rabbit, and a furry face mask.
Example 2: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Six hundred low-income African American males, 400 of whom were infected with syphilis, were monitored for 40 years. The purpose of the study was to examine the long-term effects of syphilis. The subjects of the study were the 400 African American males with syphilis, who were primarily poor sharecroppers. They were unaware that they had syphilis. They were also unaware of the true nature of the experiment. The most horrifying aspect of the experiment was that, even in the 1950s, when penicillin was proved to be effective at curing syphilis, the researchers did not treat the men’s syphilis. They even prevented other doctors who saw the participants from treating the syphilis. As many as 100 men may have died from complications of their untreated syphilis.
Example 3: NIH-Funded Studies. In the period of time between 1945 and 1966, the U.S. National Institutes of Health funded 2,000 research projects, and none of them used informed consent. An article written by Henry Beecher that appeared in the June 16, 1966, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine exposed many clinical research trials that had been funded by the government that were highly unethical. One of the examples concerned mentally retarded children at a state school who were infected with hepatitis virus. The researcher who carried out this experiment eventually became head of the pediatrics department at New York University. He felt that the experiment was justified, because finding a cure for hepatitis would help many more people. In each of Beecher’s examples, clinical trials were done on what some may consider “marginal” members of society, such as the poor, developmentally disabled, and senile. These “marginalized” members of society were unable to decide for themselves whether or not to participate in these trials.
For further information on unethical research practices, as well as examples that can be discussed in class, visit the following Internet sites:The History and Importance of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials /> Using Human Subjects for Medical Research
https://bit.ly/3tkPFmC
Objective: to promote critical thinking skills by exploring and critiquing some well-known psychological research studies regarding possible ethical violations
Directions: Read each of the following summaries of famous studies in psychology. After each one, examine the research for ethical violations. Discuss whether or not each study could be conducted today in light of modern ethical guidelines governing research, and why or why not. How each study could be redesigned to eliminate or minimize the ethical problems.
Example 1: Little Albert. Watson and Rayner (1920) taught a young boy named Albert to become afraid of a gentle white rat. At the beginning of the study, Albert was unafraid of the white rat and played freely with the animal. While he was playing with the rat, the experimenters frightened the child by making a loud noise behind him. Albert was startled and began to cry. Thereafter, he avoided the rat and would cry whenever it was brought close to him. Once this fear was learned, Watson and Rayner found that fear could also be elicited by showing Albert any furry object. He became frightened of many other furry objects such as a fur coat, a dog, a rabbit, and a furry face mask.
Example 2: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Six hundred low-income African American males, 400 of whom were infected with syphilis, were monitored for 40 years. The purpose of the study was to examine the long-term effects of syphilis. The subjects of the study were the 400 African American males with syphilis, who were primarily poor sharecroppers. They were unaware that they had syphilis. They were also unaware of the true nature of the experiment. The most horrifying aspect of the experiment was that, even in the 1950s, when penicillin was proved to be effective at curing syphilis, the researchers did not treat the men’s syphilis. They even prevented other doctors who saw the participants from treating the syphilis. As many as 100 men may have died from complications of their untreated syphilis.
Example 3: NIH-Funded Studies. In the period of time between 1945 and 1966, the U.S. National Institutes of Health funded 2,000 research projects, and none of them used informed consent. An article written by Henry Beecher that appeared in the June 16, 1966, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine exposed many clinical research trials that had been funded by the government that were highly unethical. One of the examples concerned mentally retarded children at a state school who were infected with hepatitis virus. The researcher who carried out this experiment eventually became head of the pediatrics department at New York University. He felt that the experiment was justified, because finding a cure for hepatitis would help many more people. In each of Beecher’s examples, clinical trials were done on what some may consider “marginal” members of society, such as the poor, developmentally disabled, and senile. These “marginalized” members of society were unable to decide for themselves whether or not to participate in these trials.
For further information on unethical research practices, as well as examples that can be discussed in class, visit the following Internet sites:The History and Importance of Informed Consent in Clinical Trials /> Using Human Subjects for Medical Research
https://bit.ly/3tkPFmC
Hi, there are total 6 question. I need help for them. I am requesting to the tutor who is expert in this field can accept the bid other wise don't need to accept. Less than 10% plagiarism or similarity is accept because it is a University assignment. I need Harvard style References.
1. Explain Johari Window model.( words 400-500)
2. Elucidate Maslow’s need hierarchy theory of motivation. ( words 400-500)
3. Define emotion, describe its characteristics. How does it differ from affect and moods? Explain by giving examples. ( words 400-500)
4. Define Motivation. Why is motivation important for an organization? Discuss intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.( words 400-500)
5. How the organizations manage cultural diversity? Discuss some methods to be carried out by managers to manage cultural diversity efficiently.( words 400-500)
6. Why do people resist change? Discuss the strategies which can be adapted to overcome resistance to change. ( words 400-500)
https://bit.ly/3mrARic
1. Explain Johari Window model.( words 400-500)
2. Elucidate Maslow’s need hierarchy theory of motivation. ( words 400-500)
3. Define emotion, describe its characteristics. How does it differ from affect and moods? Explain by giving examples. ( words 400-500)
4. Define Motivation. Why is motivation important for an organization? Discuss intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.( words 400-500)
5. How the organizations manage cultural diversity? Discuss some methods to be carried out by managers to manage cultural diversity efficiently.( words 400-500)
6. Why do people resist change? Discuss the strategies which can be adapted to overcome resistance to change. ( words 400-500)
https://bit.ly/3mrARic
Monday, 6 June 2022
Discussion: Ethical and Legal Foundations of PMHNP Care
Advanced practice nursing in all specialties is guided by codes of ethics that put the care, rights, duty, health, and safety of the patient first and foremost. PMHNP practice is also guided by ethical codes specifically for psychiatry. These ethical codes are frameworks to guide clinical decision making; they are generally not prescriptive. They also represent the aspirational ideals for the profession. Laws, on the other hand, dictate the requirements that must be followed. In this way, legal codes may be thought to represent the minimum standards of care, and ethics represent the highest goals for care.
Photo Credit: //Getty Images
For this Discussion, you select a topic that has both legal and ethical implications for PMHNP practice and then perform a literature review on the topic. Your goal will be to identify the most salient legal and ethical facets of the issue for PMHNP practice, and also how these facets differ in the care of adult patients versus children. Keep in mind as you research your issue, that laws differ by state and your clinical practice will be dictated by the laws that govern your state.
To Prepare
- Select one of the following ethical/legal topics:- Autonomy
- Beneficence
- Justice
- Fidelity
- Veracity
- Involuntary hospitalization and due process of civil commitment
- Informed assent/consent and capacity
- Duty to warn
- Restraints
- HIPPA
- Child and elder abuse reporting
- Tort law
- Negligence/malpractice
- In the Walden library, locate a total of four scholarly, professional, or legal resources related to this topic. One should address ethical considerations related to this topic for adults, one should be on ethical considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents, one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for adults, and one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NRNP_6665_Week2_Discussion_Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
ExcellentGoodFairPoorMain Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sourcesNo less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadthSupported by at least three current credible sources35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadthSupported by at least three credible references31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressedIs somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesisSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the modulePost is supported by fewer than two credible references0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteriaLacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesisDoes not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the moduleContains only one or no credible referencesMain Posting:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and conciselyContains no grammatical or spelling errorsAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written conciselyMay contain one to two grammatical or spelling errorsAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Written somewhat conciselyMay contain more than two spelling or grammatical errorsContains some APA formatting errors0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Not written clearly or conciselyContains more than two spelling or grammatical errorsDoes not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleMain Posting:Timely and full participation9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts main Discussion by due date8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Posts main Discussion by due dateMeets requirements for full participation7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Posts main Discussion by due date0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post main Discussion by due dateFirst Response:Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settingsResponds to questions posed by facultyThe use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.First Response:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sourcesResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sourcesResponse is written in standard, edited English.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.First Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts by due date4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participationPosts by due date3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post by due dateSecond Response:Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by facultyThe use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.Second Response:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sourcesResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sourcesResponse is written in standard, edited English.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts by due date4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participationPosts by due date3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post by due dateTotal Points: 100
https://bit.ly/3GWq8WE
Advanced practice nursing in all specialties is guided by codes of ethics that put the care, rights, duty, health, and safety of the patient first and foremost. PMHNP practice is also guided by ethical codes specifically for psychiatry. These ethical codes are frameworks to guide clinical decision making; they are generally not prescriptive. They also represent the aspirational ideals for the profession. Laws, on the other hand, dictate the requirements that must be followed. In this way, legal codes may be thought to represent the minimum standards of care, and ethics represent the highest goals for care.
Photo Credit: //Getty Images
For this Discussion, you select a topic that has both legal and ethical implications for PMHNP practice and then perform a literature review on the topic. Your goal will be to identify the most salient legal and ethical facets of the issue for PMHNP practice, and also how these facets differ in the care of adult patients versus children. Keep in mind as you research your issue, that laws differ by state and your clinical practice will be dictated by the laws that govern your state.
To Prepare
- Select one of the following ethical/legal topics:- Autonomy
- Beneficence
- Justice
- Fidelity
- Veracity
- Involuntary hospitalization and due process of civil commitment
- Informed assent/consent and capacity
- Duty to warn
- Restraints
- HIPPA
- Child and elder abuse reporting
- Tort law
- Negligence/malpractice
- In the Walden library, locate a total of four scholarly, professional, or legal resources related to this topic. One should address ethical considerations related to this topic for adults, one should be on ethical considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents, one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for adults, and one should be on legal considerations related to this topic for children/adolescents.
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Name: NRNP_6665_Week2_Discussion_Rubric
- Grid View
- List View
ExcellentGoodFairPoorMain Posting:Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.40 (40%) - 44 (44%) Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s)Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sourcesNo less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadthSupported by at least three current credible sources35 (35%) - 39 (39%) Responds to most of the Discussion question(s)Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadthSupported by at least three credible references31 (31%) - 34 (34%) Responds to some of the Discussion question(s)One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressedIs somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesisSomewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the modulePost is supported by fewer than two credible references0 (0%) - 30 (30%) Does not respond to the Discussion question(s)Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteriaLacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesisDoes not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the moduleContains only one or no credible referencesMain Posting:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Written clearly and conciselyContains no grammatical or spelling errorsAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and style5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Written conciselyMay contain one to two grammatical or spelling errorsAdheres to current APA manual writing rules and style with minor errors4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Written somewhat conciselyMay contain more than two spelling or grammatical errorsContains some APA formatting errors0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Not written clearly or conciselyContains more than two spelling or grammatical errorsDoes not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and styleMain Posting:Timely and full participation9 (9%) - 10 (10%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts main Discussion by due date8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Posts main Discussion by due dateMeets requirements for full participation7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Posts main Discussion by due date0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post main Discussion by due dateFirst Response:Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settingsResponds to questions posed by facultyThe use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.First Response:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sourcesResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sourcesResponse is written in standard, edited English.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posted in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.First Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts by due date4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participationPosts by due date3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post by due dateSecond Response:Post to colleague's main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources9 (9%) - 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.Responds to questions posed by facultyThe use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.8 (8%) - 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.7 (7%) - 7 (7%) Response is on topic, may have some depth.0 (0%) - 6 (6%) Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.Second Response:Writing6 (6%) - 6 (6%) Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sourcesResponse is effectively written in standard, edited English.5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sourcesResponse is written in standard, edited English.4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.Few or no credible sources are cited.0 (0%) - 3 (3%) Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.Responses to faculty questions are missing.No credible sources are cited.Second Response:Timely and full participation5 (5%) - 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participationPosts by due date4 (4%) - 4 (4%) Meets requirements for full participationPosts by due date3 (3%) - 3 (3%) Posts by due date0 (0%) - 2 (2%) Does not meet requirements for full participationDoes not post by due dateTotal Points: 100
https://bit.ly/3GWq8WE
Your Introduction must include:
- Your PICOT question.
- Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:- Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).
- Background on the problem or population of interest:- Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
- Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.
- Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:- State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
- Create a context to why your topic is important.
- Benefit of the project to nursing practice:- State what will be gained from your project.
- Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
- Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
- Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.
Submission Instructions:
- The introduction is original work and logically organized.
- The paper is 3 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
- Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
- Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
https://bit.ly/3xd0NDg
- Your PICOT question.
- Purpose of or rationale for the scholarly project:- Provide an evidence-based explanation of why it is necessary to complete your scholarly project and what benefit will be gained (health promotion, fiscal, and efficiency).
- Background on the problem or population of interest:- Using primary sources, provide data on your topic.
- Providing the background will demonstrate the focused need for your project.
- Significance of the problem to nursing and health care:- State how your problem or population of interest aligns with the larger interest of health care in the community.
- Create a context to why your topic is important.
- Benefit of the project to nursing practice:- State what will be gained from your project.
- Describe the expected outcomes of your project to practice within your population and setting.
- Relate the outcomes to evidence-based guidelines and outcomes.
- Describe how your project may influence other populations or settings.
Submission Instructions:
- The introduction is original work and logically organized.
- The paper is 3 pages in length and follows current APA format including citation of references.
- Incorporate a minimum of 4 current (published within the last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
- Journal articles and books should be referenced according to the current APA style (the library has a copy of the APA Manual).
https://bit.ly/3xd0NDg
The purpose of this final reflection is to: (1) offer you an opportunity to reflect on how your understanding of human development has grown and changed over the course of the semester, and (2) assess your attainment of the course objectives. As a reminder, these objectives are:
a. Demonstrate an understanding of central research questions, theories, and methodologies used in the study of human development.
b. Demonstrate an understanding of the main areas of development, emphasizing physical, cognitive, and social development and changes within these across the life span.
c. Develop skills to evaluate critically how development is influenced by contextual factors including social class, ethnicity, and family processes.
d. Develop the ability to identify, analyze, and synthesize developmental psychological concepts and apply them to explain everyday events.
In order to do this, please address the following questions in a comprehensive paper (i.e., it should be an essay, not bullet-points). For full credit, make sure to: (1) be detailed and thorough in your reflection, providing specific examples from your life or the world around you, and (2) define and describe relevant concepts from the course. For full credit, make sure to connect to at least TWO concepts covered in this class over the course of the semester. You should define/describe the concepts and then explain how the concepts connect to your everyday life. For example, if you say "I can see myself using a lot of this information in the future," make sure to elaborate. Specifically WHAT might you use and HOW do you see yourself using it?
Papers usually end up being approximately four-to-five pages in order to adequately address the prompts. Please include in-text citations and a references page at the end including ANY resources that you cite throughout (e.g., your textbook, websites, YouTube videos, etc.). See the APA resources module for more information and examples.
1. Thinking back to the beginning of the semester, how has your understanding of human development grown or changed as a result of this course? Give at least two specific examples.
2. How does this course relate to or how has this course influenced your day-to-day life? Give at least two specific examples. Consider questions such as (but not limited to):
- What are some phenomena you see in everyday life that you now understand differently / better than you did before?
- How have your understandings of or interactions with the others changed as a result of this course?
- How has this course changed how you view or understand yourself?
- Have you changed any behaviors as a result of this course?
3. How will you use what you learned in this class in your future (this can be professionally and/or personally)? Give at least two specific examples.
4. Anything else you would like to share related to human development / this class?What is Personality? - Personality Psychology - YouTube
Freud’s 5 Stages of Psychosexual Development - YouTubeHere are the 2 links for references videos. Follow instructions above.
Answer each question for the prompt.Thanks.
Requirements: 4 pages APA
https://bit.ly/3Qf0BMK
a. Demonstrate an understanding of central research questions, theories, and methodologies used in the study of human development.
b. Demonstrate an understanding of the main areas of development, emphasizing physical, cognitive, and social development and changes within these across the life span.
c. Develop skills to evaluate critically how development is influenced by contextual factors including social class, ethnicity, and family processes.
d. Develop the ability to identify, analyze, and synthesize developmental psychological concepts and apply them to explain everyday events.
In order to do this, please address the following questions in a comprehensive paper (i.e., it should be an essay, not bullet-points). For full credit, make sure to: (1) be detailed and thorough in your reflection, providing specific examples from your life or the world around you, and (2) define and describe relevant concepts from the course. For full credit, make sure to connect to at least TWO concepts covered in this class over the course of the semester. You should define/describe the concepts and then explain how the concepts connect to your everyday life. For example, if you say "I can see myself using a lot of this information in the future," make sure to elaborate. Specifically WHAT might you use and HOW do you see yourself using it?
Papers usually end up being approximately four-to-five pages in order to adequately address the prompts. Please include in-text citations and a references page at the end including ANY resources that you cite throughout (e.g., your textbook, websites, YouTube videos, etc.). See the APA resources module for more information and examples.
1. Thinking back to the beginning of the semester, how has your understanding of human development grown or changed as a result of this course? Give at least two specific examples.
2. How does this course relate to or how has this course influenced your day-to-day life? Give at least two specific examples. Consider questions such as (but not limited to):
- What are some phenomena you see in everyday life that you now understand differently / better than you did before?
- How have your understandings of or interactions with the others changed as a result of this course?
- How has this course changed how you view or understand yourself?
- Have you changed any behaviors as a result of this course?
3. How will you use what you learned in this class in your future (this can be professionally and/or personally)? Give at least two specific examples.
4. Anything else you would like to share related to human development / this class?What is Personality? - Personality Psychology - YouTube
Freud’s 5 Stages of Psychosexual Development - YouTubeHere are the 2 links for references videos. Follow instructions above.
Answer each question for the prompt.Thanks.
Requirements: 4 pages APA
https://bit.ly/3Qf0BMK
Important
- Feb 25, 2022 12:06 AMMHA/505: Systems Thinking In Health Care EnvironmentsPast due: Wk 5 - Group: Root Cause Analysis Due Date: 4/5/22, 2:59 AMDismiss
- Apr 8, 2022 1:13 AMMHA/506: Ethical Marketing: The New Health Care EconomicsPast due: Wk 5 - Group: Marketing Mix Strategy Due Date: 5/17/22, 2:59 AMDismiss
Upcoming
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report Due Date: 6/7/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 3 - Group: Visualizing Data Due Date: 6/14/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 4 - Summative Assessment: Cases by City and Ages Impacted Report Due Date: 6/21/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 6 - Summative Assessment: Data Plotting and Information Analysis Due Date: 7/5/22, 2:59 AM
Recent
-
Load 20 more stream notifications
×
Menu
MHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health Sector
MHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health Sector
Skip to main content
- Content
- Calendar
- Discussions
- Gradebook
- Messages
Venicia N.Yance
A
Total (Content isn't available yet.)
40
Wk 1 Discussion - Applied Informatics in Health Care
First participated on 5/26/22
40
Wk 2 Discussion - Wearable Devices
First participated on 6/4/22
Not graded
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Attempt 0 started
Not graded
Wk 3 Discussion - Predictive Analytics
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 3 - Group: Visualizing Data
2 attempts possible
-- / 45
Wk 4 Discussion - Access to Clinical Data
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 4 - Summative Assessment: Cases by City and Ages Impacted Report
Unlimited attempts possible
-- / 245
Wk 5 Discussion - Plotting Data on a Map
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 6 Discussion - Artificial Intelligence
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 6 - Summative Assessment: Data Plotting and Information Analysis
Unlimited attempts possible
-- / 245
×course.content.assessment.attempt.menu
Exam
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Exam Content
- This assessment directs you to analyze the uses for health data with the purpose of improving health care policies and operations. Raw data doesn’t say much to most people, but through data analysis, information can be extracted and used to “tell the story” of a particular patient population.Select or generate a dataset that is meaningful to you and your interests in the health care industry by using one of the links below:- CDC WONDER Online Databases
- HealthData.gov/Datasets
- The source of the data
- Why the data is important
- A detailed chart or graph to interpret the data
- What trends the data documents
- What changes in operations or policies can be made to improve quality or efficiencyCite 3 reputable references to support your report (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).Format your report according to APA guidelines.Include a copy of the dataset along with your report
https://bit.ly/3xoE4pp
- Feb 25, 2022 12:06 AMMHA/505: Systems Thinking In Health Care EnvironmentsPast due: Wk 5 - Group: Root Cause Analysis Due Date: 4/5/22, 2:59 AMDismiss
- Apr 8, 2022 1:13 AMMHA/506: Ethical Marketing: The New Health Care EconomicsPast due: Wk 5 - Group: Marketing Mix Strategy Due Date: 5/17/22, 2:59 AMDismiss
Upcoming
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report Due Date: 6/7/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 3 - Group: Visualizing Data Due Date: 6/14/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 4 - Summative Assessment: Cases by City and Ages Impacted Report Due Date: 6/21/22, 2:59 AM
- May 20, 2022 1:23 AMMHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health SectorDue: Wk 6 - Summative Assessment: Data Plotting and Information Analysis Due Date: 7/5/22, 2:59 AM
Recent
-
Load 20 more stream notifications
×
Menu
MHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health Sector
MHA/507: Leveraging Informatics In The Health Sector
Skip to main content
- Content
- Calendar
- Discussions
- Gradebook
- Messages
Venicia N.Yance
A
Total (Content isn't available yet.)
40
Wk 1 Discussion - Applied Informatics in Health Care
First participated on 5/26/22
40
Wk 2 Discussion - Wearable Devices
First participated on 6/4/22
Not graded
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Attempt 0 started
Not graded
Wk 3 Discussion - Predictive Analytics
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 3 - Group: Visualizing Data
2 attempts possible
-- / 45
Wk 4 Discussion - Access to Clinical Data
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 4 - Summative Assessment: Cases by City and Ages Impacted Report
Unlimited attempts possible
-- / 245
Wk 5 Discussion - Plotting Data on a Map
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 6 Discussion - Artificial Intelligence
No participation
-- / 40
Wk 6 - Summative Assessment: Data Plotting and Information Analysis
Unlimited attempts possible
-- / 245
×course.content.assessment.attempt.menu
Exam
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Wk 2 - Summative Assessment: Using Public Data Sets Report
Exam Content
- This assessment directs you to analyze the uses for health data with the purpose of improving health care policies and operations. Raw data doesn’t say much to most people, but through data analysis, information can be extracted and used to “tell the story” of a particular patient population.Select or generate a dataset that is meaningful to you and your interests in the health care industry by using one of the links below:- CDC WONDER Online Databases
- HealthData.gov/Datasets
- The source of the data
- Why the data is important
- A detailed chart or graph to interpret the data
- What trends the data documents
- What changes in operations or policies can be made to improve quality or efficiencyCite 3 reputable references to support your report (e.g., trade or industry publications, government or agency websites, scholarly works, or other sources of similar quality).Format your report according to APA guidelines.Include a copy of the dataset along with your report
https://bit.ly/3xoE4pp
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
-
Due Week 8 and worth 190 points Recall from Assignment 1 the company had a few HR-related lawsuits that were not in the company's favo...
-
Using the Global Competitive Index Report (“GCI”) accessible by this link: WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019-1.pdf Please do the...
